, but it's still a much bigger business than Azure. Exactly how much isn't clear since Microsoft doesn't report specific revenue figures for Azure, only the rate of growth.The cost debate between AWS and Microsoft primarily surrounds which cloud is cheaper for running Windows and SQL Server, both foundational software at many large companies.
Microsoft created the Windows Server server operating system and SQL Server database management system years ago — Windows Server was introduced in 2003, while SQL server goes all the way back to 1989 — and they've since become the cornerstone to the IT infrastructure at companies large and small. But while they were Microsoft inventions, both products are supported on rival clouds including AWS and Google Cloud Platform.
Microsoft can provide a "big economic advantage" to cloud customers because of its "rich history" with products like Microsoft Windows Server and SQL Server, Numoto said. Microsoft declined to provide more information on Numoto's claims. The cost comparison to which the exec is referring appears to be from 2018 whenAWS declined to comment about Numoto's comments, but Amazon Web Services Vice President Sandy Carter
Microsoft's cost comparisons are misleading when it comes to running Windows workloads in the cloud. AWS says it runs Windows-based workloads such as Windows Server and SQL Server for companies like Adobe and Salesforce.
Belgique Dernières Nouvelles, Belgique Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
La source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Lire la suite »
La source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Lire la suite »
La source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Lire la suite »