Contrary to popular belief, the stock market and economy have performed better under Democratic presidents than it has under Republican presidents, according to data going back to 1946.
And if you exclude the Great Recession and COVID-19 pandemic, both of which happened under a Republican president, the data still points to stronger returns for Democratic presidents versus Republican presidents.It's a widely held view that Republican presidents are better for the economy and stock market than Democratic presidents, because of their drive to cut taxes and reduce government spending. But the data says otherwise.
According to Liberum, the average annual US GDP growth rate under a Democratic president was 3.6%, compared to 2.6% for a Republican president. And those economic gains trickled down to stock market gains as well.RBC says buy these 48 stocks spanning every industry that are poised to crush the market if Donald Trump wins reelection
Therefore, Liberum also looked at the historical data from 1947 to 2006, which excludes both the Great Recession and the COVID-19 pandemic. While Republicans aim to stimulate the economy via tax cuts and deregulation, Democrats aim to stimulate consumption with redistribution policies like increased unemployment benefits, increased child credits, and food stamp support, Liberum noted.Morgan Stanley breaks down 3 reasons why stocks could be headed for a short-term correction as the market gets dragged higher by a few big winners
Does not matter , who is on power. It’s all about GDP. Supply and demand. So many other things. So please be smart. Yes I like the way he is handling Chaines tariffs. He is 100 percent right on that point.
Lol haha so when dems r in power ul say the market is a good indicator in the economy
Says the criminals on the Left
This couldn’t be any more wrong. How stupid are you guys?!? Lol!!
LOLOLOLOLOLOL.....I can tell you right now. This is TOTAL BULLSHIT. Free markets are better for the economy. Less taxes, less regulation—which is NOT what the democrats are about. Your measuring system sucks (wrong metrics) or you’re analysis is total crap.
You should change your magazine name to dickinsider. Probably make more sense for your journalistic integrady.
Fake news based on the Stock Market now! 🇺🇸
Duh.
That's like saying diet & exercise r bad b/c people have heart attacks & get injuries. If you're lazy & eat like shit, a lot needs to be fixed, but once you get fit you feel better than ever! You can't eat sugar &bacon all day w/o it killing you, no matter how good it tastes!
Even though Democrats are better for stock markets and the economy, I've never seen stocks rallying up at this pace as it is trading currently. Nevertheless, Donald Trump is causing no good, not just to the American economy but the whole world.
Because they destroy countries to control the price of oil.
What about the other studies
My investments over the last 20 years completely disagree.
It’s every study based in fact. It’s a pretty simple graph to understand.
Media in full propaganda mode hahaha
BS
More like sleepy don
Yes - true For Chinese stock markets
Very objective 😅
It's a study by FAKE NEWS organization. Not buying it
They're not Russian puppets, either. Do you think Putin and his FSB spy agency have compromised President Trump? Please take quick poll: (comments welcome)
u arent biased at all!
Belgique Dernières Nouvelles, Belgique Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
La source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Lire la suite »
La source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Lire la suite »
La source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Lire la suite »
La source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Lire la suite »
La source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Lire la suite »