Rapid coronavirus test vs 'gold standard' PCR test: professor explains - Business Insider

  • 📰 BusinessInsider
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 26 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 51%

Belgique Nouvelles Nouvelles

A public health professor explains the difference between rapid COVID-19 tests from a pharmacy and the 'gold standard' lab results — and says people should be tested every 3 days

tested the same device in students without symptoms, and reportedly picked up just 3% of PCR-positive cases. John Deeks, professor of Biostatistics at the University of Birmingham, said in a statement to the Science Media Centre that rapid antigen tests should be, as if it were a new drug, before mass testing is rolled out.

The information is confused because the studies compare against testing PCR positive, rather than how infectious someone is. I think we should "test before you go" to workplaces where most mixing happens. And places like supermarkets. [Testing supermarket workers] will have a knock on effect of protecting the customer, and the local community. We can learn that from where the tests are first applied to very large numbers of people — what are the effects on behavior of getting a negative result?

 

Merci pour votre commentaire. Votre commentaire sera publié après examen.

SciInsider Duh!!! Unclear whether rapid tests on detect the new variants. COVID-19

horrible

Nous avons résumé cette actualité afin que vous puissiez la lire rapidement. Si l'actualité vous intéresse, vous pouvez lire le texte intégral ici. Lire la suite:

 /  🏆 729. in BE

Belgique Dernières Nouvelles, Belgique Actualités