Why the Competition Bureau is taking the Rogers-Shaw merger to court

, arguing that a merger of Canada’s two largest cable companies would reduce competition and result in higher cell phone bills, poorer service, and less choice for consumers.

In order to avoid eliminating a wireless competitor, and hoping to address the Competition Bureau’s concerns, Rogers and Shaw agreed to sell Shaw’s Freedom Mobile to Quebecor’s Videotron as part of the deal in June. in Alberta and B.C., because Quebecor and other potential buyers of Freedom refused to bid on the division.Despite Rogers and Shaw agreeing to sell Freedom Mobile to a competitor, the Competition Bureau opposes the merger.in the Competition Tribunal, the agency argued that Freedom would come out of a sale as a weakened competitor because Rogers would acquire a number of Shaw’s assets such as infrastructure and personnel.

TL:DR: It sucks. Both of these companies are saying that less competition is better for consumers. You don't even need to take Business 101 to know how wrong that is.

Belgique Dernières Nouvelles, Belgique Actualités

Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.

Rogers, Shaw face off against competition watchdog in court over $20-billion mergerRogers and Shaw are finally having their day in court to argue against the Competition Bureau, which sued to block the deal. Read more here.
La source: financialpost - 🏆 7. / 85 Lire la suite »

Rogers-Shaw merger would take out a ‘disruptive, competitive player,’ Competition Bureau lawyer tells tribunalShaw lawyer argues there is almost no overlap between Rogers and Shaw’s businesses and consumers will lose if deal is blocked. Many of us BoycottRogers and will have no problem boycotting Shaw. That's hilarious. That’s a view from a unbiased party. 😂 my god are there any real journalists left at the star.
La source: TorontoStar - 🏆 60. / 55 Lire la suite »