Senate confirms protege of industry-friendly Mick Mulvaney to head Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 82%

Brasil Notícia Notícia

Brasil Últimas Notícias,Brasil Manchetes

The Senate has narrowly confirmed White House aide Kathy Kraninger to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Experts predict a continuation of the industry-friendly shift the CFPB has taken since Trump installed an acting director last year.

 

Obrigado pelo seu comentário. Seu comentário será publicado após ser revisado.

Another creature for the swamp.

Majority, majority, majority: 'That’s what Senate Democrats fear. None voted to confirm her as director of the powerful, independent agency. The final was tally was 50-49, with only Republicans supporting the nomination.'

Is 'narrowly confirmed' the same as conformation?

Good CFPB has been nothing but corruption, time to taper its activities.

The CFPB is an unconstitutional fraud with no oversight that was used during the Obama administration to shake down businesses to fund far left NGO's. Shut it down.

Donald Trump Caught On Tape With Sexy Russian Spy Maria Butina; NEW EPISODE OF 'BE LESS STUPID'

Oh well, what's one more unqualified ninny in the Administration at this point?

Resumimos esta notícia para que você possa lê-la rapidamente. Se você se interessou pela notícia, pode ler o texto completo aqui. Consulte Mais informação:

 /  🏆 11. in BR

Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes

Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.

Senate Confirms Trump Official as Consumer-Finance RegulatorThe Senate has approved Kathy Kraninger to run the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, putting a full-time Trump-appointed official in charge of the agency for the first time. UNQUALIFIED !!!!!! The GOP continuing to dick over the public 👍 Good. Maybe she’s there to shut this waste of💰 down. If so, she’s probably overqualified.
Fonte: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Consulte Mais informação »