Tribunal hears final pitches from Rogers, Shaw ahead of merger ruling

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 58 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 92%

Brasil Notícia Notícia

Brasil Últimas Notícias,Brasil Manchetes

The Competition Bureau is asking the tribunal to block the deal in its entirety, arguing that it would result in higher cellphone bills and poorer wireless service, particularly in Western Canada

At issue is whether the divestiture of Shaw’s Freedom Mobile to Quebecor Inc.’s Videotron Ltd. for $2.85-billion would weaken Canada’s fourth-largest wireless carrier, which serves customers in Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia. The competition watchdog asserts that Videotron has no track record of operating in Western Canada, and that separating Freedom from assets such as Shaw’s cable network and brand would hamper its competitiveness.

“Of course, that is precisely why Telus has made every conceivable effort to attack and to undermine and to derail this transaction over a period of almost two years,” he later added. Shaw’s lawyers have argued, on the basis of the testimony provided by several company executives, that the Competition Bureau has exaggerated Freedom Mobile’s success and competitive significance. Shaw representatives have told the tribunal that Freedom has not been profitable and that Shaw has yet to recoup the $4.5-billion it has invested in wireless since 2016.

Mr. Rook said that Videotron has negotiated a “very attractive price” for the business, as well as favourable terms with regards to roaming, cable network access and other agreements. Jonathan Lisus, a lawyer representing Rogers, said Wednesday that the argument “makes no sense,” adding that there is already a regulatory regime in place to respond to allegations of anti-competitive behaviour.“If the [Competition Bureau’s] draconian remedy is granted, the industry and competition will regress, to the detriment of the public interest, consumer choice and telecom policy,” Mr. Lisus said.

 

Obrigado pelo seu comentário. Seu comentário será publicado após ser revisado.

Canada is a joke. Oligopolies are allowed. We should be in the streets. No wonder Trudeau is pushing internet censorship.

I was on Vancouver Island for a wedding during the outage and my Airbnb luckily had Shaw, if they had been merged I would have had no cell service, wifi or access to my bank account for the entire time on the other side of the country.

Resumimos esta notícia para que você possa lê-la rapidamente. Se você se interessou pela notícia, pode ler o texto completo aqui. Consulte Mais informação:

 /  🏆 5. in BR

Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes

Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.

Competition Bureau pleads to tribunal to block Rogers-Shaw merger 'for millions of people'Competition Bureau lawyer said consumers in B.C. and Alberta will lose the benefits of effective competition. Read more.
Fonte: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Consulte Mais informação »

Stop Rogers-Shaw merger to protect consumers, Competition Bureau pleads to tribunalCompetition Bureau lawyer said consumers in B.C. and Alberta will lose the benefits of effective competition. Read more.
Fonte: calgarysun - 🏆 63. / 52 Consulte Mais informação »

Competition Bureau pleads to tribunal to block Rogers-Shaw merger 'for millions of people'Competition Bureau lawyer said consumers in B.C. and Alberta will lose the benefits of effective competition. Read more. Where is Trudeau interfering with this Not in his best interest I presume. I’m sorry, I’m just a concerned Canadian Canada needs more competition. ugh That means I'll have to stick with my Shaw re-seller and no hope of things ever improving at this address. Helluva racket. Forced to have the Internet and put up with more than 20 drops a day. infuriating
Fonte: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Consulte Mais informação »