Goldman Sachs CEO says no IPOs for companies without at least one 'diverse' board member starting in July | Markets Insider

in Davos, Switzerland that starting in July, the bank won't help companies without at least one"diverse" board member, with a focus on women, go public. "We might miss some business," Solomon said."But in the long run, this I think is the best advice for companies that want to drive premium returns for their shareholders." Goldman Sachs is putting its foot down when it comes to the board diversity of companies it helps with the initial public offering process.

Over the last four years,"the performance of IPOs where there's been a woman on the board in the US is significantly better than the performance of IPOs where there hasn't been a woman on the board," he said. "We might miss some business," he said."But in the long run, this I think is the best advice for companies that want to drive premium returns for their shareholders." Goldman Sachs has four women on its board of 11.

So, when are USA women going to demand their right to have the honor to sign up for selective services which ALL male USA citizens are OBLIGATED by law? Not really equal yet, are you? Do illegals sign up? Yeah, I see equal happening all over this place! MAGA howdoyoulikeusnow

Bring back Lloyd.

Hi, I’m diverse and brown. I’ll be more than happy to be on your bored with zero experience so your company can qualify for a low low fee of 30k a year lol 😊

Lol 1

Sad.

So more white women on the boards then.

How about promising no IPOs that defraud retail investors GoldmanSachs

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Boeing CEO says taking fresh look at potential mid-market aircraftBoeing Co is taking a fresh look at a potential new mid-market aircraft, Chief E... Build planes that don’t kill people They fucked up on a biblical scale. They discontinued the 757 production banking that the Max's would fill the void, but its a defective design that was supposed to be hidden/covered up by superior software. We all see how that's turning out. Boring cannot afford to underestimate the publics lack of confidence in the 737 Max now. They need to scrap that line irrespective of the cost, or at least show a replacement of the computer systems with one used in existing aircraft, & ditch the 737 Max name
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »