Elon Musk blasts SpaceX competitor ULA as 'a complete waste of taxpayer money'

  • 📰 CNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 44 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 72%

Business Business Headlines News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

“Because their rockets are not reusable, it will become obvious over time that ULA is a complete waste of taxpayer money,” Elon Musk said.

The Air Force also awarded the first three missions under the contract, with ULA getting $337 million for two launches and SpaceX getting $316 million for the other mission, all due to launch in 2022.

Musk's criticism of ULA centers around reusing rockets, which he says is "all that matters" for space — both to decrease the cost of access as well as expanding the U.S. military's influence. SpaceX has steadily pushed the boundaries of reusing rockets, most notably by landing the booster that makes up the largest and most expensive part. SpaceX has been able to reuse a single Falcon booster as many as five times and is also increasingly reusing the nosecones as well.

The landed Falcon 9 rocket booster from SpaceX's Demo-2 crewed mission returns to Port Canaveral in Florida.ULA on the other hand has been developing its Vulcan rocket, to both replace its aging Atlas and Delta rockets and end the use of Russian-built rocket engines. ULA's Atlas V rocket is powered by RD-180 engines, which are bought from Russia.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

elonmusk won’t they go down reuseable path eventually? Could build components. A lot of history there...

Eon is right, ULA only got the contract because of long standing connections and because NASA not want to be reliant on only one contractor. However, the share should have been 60% for SpaceX and not ULA bcs of the reason he mentioned.

My rockets are single use—I shoot them in your wives

Mr Elon, F U

Electric car subsidies are a complete waste of taxpayer money.

Shots fired

It’s possible for a single use vehicle to be more economical than one which must be completely rebuilt after a single use. Musk should back up his statement with facts and figures

For SpaceX it is also only partial re-use.. and commercial means ?

Maybe I was wrong.... : ) elonmusk JordanJamesEtem SpaceX

Makes sense!!

Corporate welfare from the USA defence department

Love Elon😍❤️

It is obvious to me right now.

ELON KNOWS BEST, ALWAYS - TESLA - SPACE X - TOGETHER FOREVER TO THE GALAXY FAR FAR AWAY

UAL is an important part of our PAST. But it’s stuck in the past and bloated and expensive. It WAS the only game in town..

Selfish guys. NASA need to care about him as his Action based in person insisted to Work as USA term for public funds. once he remains alone He will benefit Chinese as he is near them by giving high technology in new Tesla cars factory inside china

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 12. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines