Coal mine expansion project 'no risk' to Sydney's drinking water, says mining company

  • 📰 abcnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 42 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 83%

Business News News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

A coal mining company seeking to expand beneath Sydney's drinking water catchment says it has 'engineered out' any risk to the environment — but locals are wary.

A New South Wales coal mining company that wants to expand a mothballed operation beneath Sydney's drinking water catchment says it has "engineered out" any risk to the environment.Wollongong Coal is seeking approval to extract 3.7 million tonnes of coal from its Russell Vale colliery over five years

"It excludes longwall mining and has engineered out the risk associated with mining under the water catchment, as well as the noise generated, air quality, and the visual impacts on the pit top area. "The revised bord-and-pillar mining method addressed the key concerns raised in previous reports, in relation to the uncertainty around subsidence and groundwater impacts," director of resource assessments, Steven O'Donoghue, said.

"As soon as the mine starts up again, with its dropping coal from a high conveyer onto stockpiles, on unsealed roads, we will again be beset by heavy loads of coal dust falling in the vicinity." Members of the Seacliff Coasters running group also questioned the mine's impact on public amenity and recreational use of the Illawarra escarpment.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

and we all know how trustworthy mining companies are. Just like tobacco companies and big pharma.

Coal expansion project clearly is a risk to Sydney’s drinking water. It should be the coal company’s responsibility to explain how it will rectify the damage when it occurs and what water Sydney will drink after it has been contaminated.

says mining company.......🤣🤣🤪🤪

LNP also approved coal mine under the water catchment of the Central Coast, which supplies water to over 300,000 ppl. After promising to reject it during election. They're destroying the whole country. LNPCrimeSyndicate

Bah ahaha

thats what they say in the US as well. Facts vary a little.

A mining company can't say anything, but whichever individual made that erroneous statement or decision, was lying, there is never *No* risk. PrecautionaryPrinciple WaterisLife NSWpol corruption

' ... chief executive Warwick Lidbury said the company would use a bord-and-pillar mining method to mitigate subsidence.? 'Mitigate', right? That means,'make something bad less severe, serious, or painful.'. Encouraging!

Well I suppose they would, wouldn't they

What the f*** are we doing expanding coal mining in the first place? This is sick!

sure

Yes.. Because the LNP are so trustworthy with water lol nswpol AusPol AusPol2020

How much in taxpayers money is this coal mine subsidised?

Coal mine expansion is a RISK TO THE ENTIRE PLANET! and Life on Earth

Says mining company!? Ffs. Paedophiles no risk to children says Church

What else would they say....?

May be the case, but I’m not sure the mining company’s view holds much water 💦 So, why ask them?

Drinking water supply under threat - and it seems not much of an issue to you? THisisnotJournalism

👍 good to know, was concerned. Keep up the good work ‘mining company’

It’s all in the headline aye 🤣🤣🤣

so Ita's ABC now doing mining company propaganda ? 😏......well sorry folks we are totally doomed now ?

Oh and we believe the mining company!

And I’ve got a lovely bridge to sell..

Duncan Rayner, the principal engineer at the UNSW Water Research Laboratory, said the company's existing operations beneath the water catchment have undermined some of the upland swamp's sandstone beds, meaning many of them can no longer store water.

I'd say BULLSHIT!!! Indeed if they are denying it then it's likely to happen.

Wollongong Coal is FOS & once the damage is done there'll be no fixing it. FFS GladysB haven't you destroyed NSW environment enough yet? YOU ARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL VANDAL JodiMcKayMP you MUST help fight this. Our drinking water relies on it. ShutTheGate

Not good enough!

And when theres nothing left to drink, at least we still have coal to keep our planet warm. ItsTheSmallThings GlassHalfFull

Increase in smoking ‘no risk’ to public health says tobacco company.

expanded zebra butchery 'no risk' to local zebra herd, says lion.

well they would say that wouldn’t they.

Feeds on Life Force and Emissions

So now I have to pay a million dollars to live in a shtholle and drink horse pi$$?

Oh no worries. All good then 😉

Says now a spokesperson for the mining industry. ClimateCrisis

I call BS!

soo do you just believe them and broadcast it as the truth - where's journalism gone?

Mines never are.

Pretty standard response. 'These chickens will be fine with me, have a great day out' said the fox.

What else would the mining company say ? 🤣🤦🏻‍♂️

McDonald’s food won’t make you fat says McDonald’s 🙄

Auto maker claims car exhaust is healthy. GE claims PCBs are beneficial. Monsanto claims GMOs will save the planet.

Make sure that mining company drinks the water out of the taps on that property.

Why would anyone believe or trust them?

Ask the mining company WHY please

LOL, what would you expect them to say, the truth?

Hilarity ensues - see the feed

It must be true because mining companies have never put money before the best interests of people .

...and fracking doesn’t effect ground water. (Who needs some silly basin thingy anyway!) I’m sure someone’s already replied as such but apparently if you just keep repeating these things they become true.

These are the same people who blow up sacred lands.... and you are expected to trust them

ABCscience Oh, well as long as the mining company says it's fine, it's probably fine...

'...says mining company' is where this story should've been thrown in the bin.

ABCscience It's only news should they say the opposite

Whew, we can rest easy then. Thanks mining company.

Coal company also says “Global warming isn’t a thing”.

They Would say that! Duh!

Bullshit

Yeah no worries. Not that they are in it for the $$$.

OF COURSE WE TRUST YOU, LOOK AT YOUR RECORD!

Where have we heard this before ?!!

Another GladysB fail

yeah . . nah.

'says mining company' Most trustworthy statement ever, right there.

'Coal mine expansion project 'no risk' to Sydney's drinking water, says mining company' Yes, because it's not like a mining company has participated in KNOWINGLY damaging some of the most valuable & ancient rock art in the Juukan Gorge cave in the Pilbara.

And when it's too late they'll say 'woops', get a subsiduary to fail to avoid any costs, and move on

How gullible would someone have to be to believe this. What a nice spot and they're going to wreck it for crappy coal. NoMoreCoal

Until it is. Then you won't see them for dust.

Karmageddon67 I wouldn't believe a mining company if they paid me a $1billion. auspol MSM

Get on with building it.

Why does Australia expand coal production, when every other country has closed or is closing their mines. auspol

Just a risk to our entire ecosystem.

Another lie! Next they'll be saying mining employs thousands of people!

Karmageddon67 Dam breach sends toxic coal ash flowing into a major North ... [Search domain

'says mining company' - who are of course completely trustworthy and have never put profits over the wellbeing of people... 🤣🤣

They would say that, wouldn't they?

Dracula poses no risk to the Blood Bank

It's only a risk to the world

They would say that, der...

That's what every mining company would say

The caves of First Nations significance were at no risk either.

Yeah let's risk the drinking water of millions of people. Risk reward yada yada yada

“...says mining company.” Well that’s all okay then, because mining companies are paragons of truth and virtue with excellent environmental track records.

🤬

Let them tunnel under their own drinking water then

'Explosives don't kill people.' - Military Grade Bomb Maker

It's about time politicians started the nuclear electrical generation debate. Nuclear technology of the 2020s is safe, reliable and ultimately cheaper than those currently available. With over 90 such plants safely operating in the USA this has to be the best option.

this china the biggest consumer of coal in the world and their demand has dropped do you really need an expansion. is it justified? we have a terrible economy with too much reliance on mining and pokie machines and fines and fees. tourism and education revenue dropped.hmmm

Foxes no risk to henhouse, says Fox.

bullshit They should be stopped The public objected on raising Warragamba but for miners it should be OK Spill in a flood would be unavoidable

And you’d believe a mining company.

If you get shot it will not effect your health say bullet manufacturers.

Granville4879 Scorpion tells frog 'jump on mate, she'll be right'

Yeah well they would wouldn’t they 🙄

'Starving cheetah perfect as family pet!' says very large & suspiciously skinny cat.

No risk at all until something goes wrong and said risk occurs. Then they just walk away.

Now ask someone who isn't going to benefit financially

Coal, by nature, is not clean. Aside from releasing CO2, which contributes to global warming, burning coal releases sooty particulates that can cause cancer and respiratory problems, sulphur and nitrogen, which contribute to acid rain, and other toxic chemicals.

sure

well if the mining company says so, then everyone move on. nothing to see here.

'Promises, promises, always promises!'

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines