US banks didn't shutter branches as rapidly as we thought this year - Business Insider

  • 📰 BusinessInsider
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 30 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 15%
  • Publisher: 51%

Business News News

Regulatory bodies prevented major changes regarding banking branch closures amid the pandemic

and consolidate their branch networks in certain areas, such as those that were already seeing less foot traffic prior to the pandemic. customers to digital channels and set the stage for long-term usage. Amid closures and general stay-at-home measures, digital became the most accessible and convenient way for customers to manage their money.

Permanent branch closures would allow banks to offset losses incurred as a result of the pandemic. Major banks allocated billions of dollars to prepare for the economic fallout of the crisis. And because operating one bank branch is so costly—they an estimated $600,000 to $800,000 to run annually—this was one area banks could have turned to to cut significant expenses.

While these factors are still in play, we did not end up seeing the expected level of branch closures—due largely to regulatory influence. In July, the acting head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 729. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines