Los Angeles County Superior Court granted summary judgment to Judicial Watch on Friday. The conservative legal group had argued the law violates the equal protection clause of California’s constitution. The ruling did not provide Judge Terry Green’s reasoning behind the decision.
“This historic California court decision declared unconstitutional one of the most blatant and significant attacks in the modern era on constitutional prohibitions against discrimination,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.Article content
Imagine obtaining thing just because of your skin color? Must feel bad looking in the mirror every morning
That's good news - the new law was so unfair to Trans boards who already identified as diverse
How would they determine who is a member of one of these communities? DNA tests? Or would you have to make out with a dude in front of them to get appointed?
What happened to the one requiring a certain number of women that the prior had pushed through even though he admitted it was unconstitutional?
Ever since CA passed this law years ago, I've been waiting for this. Racial quotas are a blatant violation of the constitution—especially racial quotas enforced upon the private sector.
Whaaaaaaa? Nooooo waaaay. No one saw that coming 🧐
'The ruling did not provide Judge Terry Green’s reasoning behind the decision'. Because it violates the contitution. Duh 😆
jordanbpeterson