Commentary: Boosting defence spending now won't fix NATO's decades of under-investment

  • 📰 ChannelNewsAsia
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 52 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 66%

Business News News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

Russia's heavy losses in Ukraine raise questions about whether they can continue operations at this rate. The West will find itself in similar trouble in the event of a long war, as defence spending has remained consistently below target, says an academic.

Denmark says it will achieve the 2 per cent goal by 2033, after having historically spent far below the NATO average on its defence.

In 2018, then United States president, Donald Trump, commented that European members of NATO were not spending enough on defence and suggested that the US might leave the alliance. But the US has for decades felt that Europe’s NATO members do not carry enough of the burden for protecting Europe, as it spends much more on defence as a percentage of its GDP than they do.

During the 1970s and 1980s, several US and British units were earmarked for deployment to Denmark because NATO command knew that its forces were inadequate for the task even of self-defence. This evidence throws doubt on Truss’ comment that “we’ve shown that we’re prepared to prioritise security and respect for sovereignty over short-term economic gain”.To save money, Western governments have cut defence spending and depended on limited numbers of weapon systems and military equipment. This makes sense to most people in peacetime.

A host of NATO countries are now pledging to provide a range of heavy weapons and equipment to Ukraine.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines