How companies exiting Russia are faring

  • 📰 TheEconomist
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 55 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 92%

Business News News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

Many have reported significant forfeiture of assets; greater losses are expected in future. Yet shunning Vladimir Putin’s regime is playing out surprisingly well with investors

Write-downs recorded by companies in quarterly reports suggest that divestment was costly. On April 28th McDonald’s announced that closing its 847 restaurants in Russia cost the fast-food company $127m in the first quarter ending in March. Renault recorded a $175m loss following its own suspension of business in Russia, after scathing accusations from Ukraine’s president that the French carmaker was “financing the murder of children and women”.

Oil and gas firms that pulled out gave up even more. After abandoning its 20% share in Russia’s Rosneft, BP reported a $24bn write-down. Shell expects to lose $5bn; Exxon, $3.4bn. Despite these losses, investors appear more confident in the long-term prospects of firms that chose to leave. According to an analysis by researchers at the Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute, the stockmarket has rewarded companies that have divested. The team ranked roughly 1,000 companies based on how thoroughly they cut ties with Russia: the highest scores were given to firms that exited completely; the lowest, to those that continued to operate.

This analysis does not take into account long-term trends in share prices before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, so establishing the causal effect of firms’ divestment decisions is tricky. Still, the findings suggest that the market placed more weight on the reputational effects of doing business with Russia than the economic losses incurred by leaving. On this, at least, the stockmarket seems to prefer the moral high ground.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

It's better to fail in originality than to succeed in imitation that was the word you have to me, and behold I'm doing great today and that's because I help to your advices Geoffrey100k it's been cool ever since I started investing with you

No mention of ethics, just reputation. Thankfully both accidentally aligned.

What characterizes state regulation of the economy are long-term development programs.

Sanction Russia back to the Stone Age!

You must not forget that about $500 billion of Western assets in Russia will be confiscated in retaliatory sanctions. Russia is just beginning to impose retaliatory sanctions, and Europe is already in an economic collapse.

Looters, robbers, and thieves are all out in the West!

👍

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines