How the Feds Are Prosecuting NFT Insider Trading Scheme as Wire Fraud – and Why That Matters

  • 📰 CoinDesk
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 17 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 63%

Business Business Headlines News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

With its indictment of Nathaniel Chastain, the U.S. Department of Justice last week took an innovative step in applying established criminal theories of liability to NFTs. David Axelrod and Andrew N. D'Aversa of BallardSpahrLLP write

. For instance, the wire fraud count is premised on a “violation of the duties [Chastain] owed to OpenSea.” In other words, the DOJ’s theory is that the breach of Chastain’s agreement with OpenSea not to use confidential business information for personal gain constituted wire fraud. While insider trading prosecutions require a breach of duty, wire fraud prosecutions do not.

It is curious that there is no companion SEC case to the action by the Southern District of New York. The SEC has been focusing on regulation of digital assets, especially NFTs. The Chastain indictment indicates that the Southern District of New York will be a partner with the SEC in regulating NFT marketplaces.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 291. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines