The containers, which included clothing items, were flagged by the revenue service's electronic risk engine designed to pick up fraud and illegal activities.The SCA affirmed SARS's right to seize and detain the goods.
The respondents in the case argued that SARS' decision must be set aside due to 'procedural unfairness and irrationality' but the SCA argued that SARS acted within its mandate. The Supreme Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of the South African Revenue Service in its case with a freight company. Sars seized nineteen containers from China in 2020, saying the goods had been under-declared on import.
The very last thing South Africa needs are striking workers. SARS wages and perks not good enough? Resign now: there are plenty of people with university degrees desperate to replace you. We need educated union bosses that understand economics. Not professional blackmailers.
Cyril Ramaphosa Step Aside Missile.
I never believe in making money online before but since I started seeing different people testifying about Cynthia_Neliwe1 ,i was so interested in to investing with her because all friends who Invested have all received their profits successfully and so do I Cynthia_Neliwe1
Rich President