That was the confounding mix of messages planning committee confronted this week, when its members considered a more ambitious bylaw governing the collection of parkland — or cash-in-lieu — from the people behind development projects.
For residential development greater than 18 units per hectare, the current parkland contribution requirement is one hectare per 300 dwelling units, or, if it’s cash-in-lieu, per 500 dwelling units, with a cap at 10 per cent of land area for apartment builds. The bylaw would “significantly damage housing affordability for residents and, in some cases, put the economic viability of residential projects into question,” Fotenn’s Lisa Dalla Rosa said while speaking on behalf of the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association.
“It has to be absorbed somewhere,” she told Curry. “And … the industry is not not-for-profit, they have to go into this with some sort of incentive to actually go out and build these things, and make some sort of profit.” “I was going to ask just rhetorically, but I think it’s actually a serious question. Do people buying homes, apartments, condos, do they not care about having enough park space?” he asked Malhotra.
Let me guess, it will also increase the cost of a home significantly. Back to the drawing board. We are short about 70,000 units in Ottawa and requiring more money to buy or rent a unit isn’t going to help anyone.
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: financialpost - 🏆 7. / 85 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »