The Arctic Council — the main diplomatic forum of the eight Arctic states — has long been described as an exceptional space for co-operation with Russia, kept insulated from East-West rivalries. But the war in Ukraine has posed an unprecedented challenge. Russia’s illegal invasion means it can’t be business as usual. Arctic relations are in turmoil, with implications for Canada’s approach to regional co-operation and its relationship with Russia.
That leaves the Arctic Council in a quandary. Other forums exist to address Arctic issues: the International Maritime Organization, various multilateral fisheries arrangements, and numerous climate and environmental agreements, for example. But the Arctic Council, uniquely, includes formal Indigenous representation through six organizations representing the Inuit, Sami, Aleut, Gwich’in, Athabascan and Russian Indigenous peoples.
The other seven Arctic states are committed to a rules-based international order. As such they must consider the rules that govern the Arctic Council, which affirm that Russia is a member, and that decisions are to be made by consensus.Article content The second option is to continue the Arctic Council without Russian concurrence: maintain its working groups, secretariat, and rules of procedure but evolve to a membership of just seven. This option would assume that no normalization with Russia can take place in the next five or more years, and rather than depend on a gentlemen’s agreement to keep Russia from attending meetings, just make a clean break.
Why would you want them there? To take the Arctic by military force? Exactly what they would intend - Russia should be shut out of global institutions
It take only 10 days for Chinese goods to be shipped to Europe through northern passage.
No
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: sudburydotcom - 🏆 6. / 89 Read more »