from Getty Images isn’t quite as sour on AI, suggesting that “artificial intelligence has the potential to stimulate creative endeavors.” But Getty’s legal claim is similar. Stability AI “chose to ignore viable licensing options and long-standing legal protections in pursuit of their standalone commercial interests,” the company said.lot of artists have complained that AI art tools spit out images that appear to blatantly copy their styles. Getty Images can make a similar claim.
t’s likely that this just the begin of a drawn out legal battle with a lot more cases on the horizon. Though you might count on US courts to lean in favor of corporate goals, there are giant corporations on both sides of this fight. As of now, the owners of the source material in the enormous databases that forms the building blocks of AI tools aren’t compensated or even consulted.
More to the point, a lot of artists have complained that AI art tools spit out images that appear to blatantly copy their styles. Getty Images can make a similar claim. Some AI art tools actually include the Getty Images watermark in the graphics they produce, making it plain how big of a role Getty’s intellectual property plays in the algorithms.The issue gets at another legal problem already working its way through the legal system.
Some of the players in the AI art lawsuits are already trying to address these ethical and legal concerns.
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SFBusinessTimes - 🏆 78. / 68 Read more »