Supreme Court endorses race-based districting

  • 📰 dcexaminer
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 14 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 9%
  • Publisher: 94%

Business Business Headlines News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

Chief Justice John Roberts famously wrote in a 2006 political redistricting case that “it is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.” In a landmark redistricting decision on June 8, Roberts engaged in exactly this sordid business.

Because of Roberts’s 5-4 decision in Allen v. Milligan, Alabama, race relations, and constitutional law all may fundamentally be harmed.Against separate, spirited dissents from Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, who were joined in whole or part by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, the Supreme Court majority invalidated Alabama’s congressional district maps, essentially ordering the state to produce two “black-majority” districts among its seven.

As Thomas noted, Alabama’s population distribution is such that the only way to create a second black-majority congressional district is to abandon race-neutral principles and make race the predominant “precondition” for figuring out where to draw district lines.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines