“essentially transfers shares to other investors who may be unwilling to engage companies about climate change.”
Many other large investors have made this argument, but the evidence shows that engaging fossil fuel companies about climate change has accomplished very little. Just last week, when the Church of England divested, the archbishop of Canterbury explained that years of shareholder engagement simply hadn’t made enough of a difference.
If California’s public employee pensions still believe in shareholder engagement, I think they should prove that their interactions are making a difference. What efforts have they made, and what concrete results have been achieved?I suspect that investors, even as large as these, are powerless to force fossil fuel companies to change.
It makes no fiduciary sense to invest in companies whose continued operation must be phased out for the survival of this planet. Prezant should seriously reconsider if these risky investments fulfill the mission to “secure the financial future of California’s public school teachers.”