DavidRivkin Next time a cop pulls me over I will just say 'You have no business investigating me for conduct that occurred before I pulled over'
DavidRivkin Agree
DavidRivkin WSJ...aka...”Fascism Today”
DavidRivkin Have you people no shame at all? Any piece of garbage passes as opinion worth publishing? Just because the law enforcement and congress had not done its due diligence when this sorry excuse for a human being ran for the office, everyone now should be hands off?
DavidRivkin Your tax dollars at work!
DavidRivkin And his tax returns. Sharing them has no bearing on governmental functions.
DavidRivkin Well I would expect a Rupert Murdoch rag to say this.
DavidRivkin Wall Street Journal comes out in favor of crime.
DavidRivkin Agreed. There are so many bigger problems in the world. America needs to be united.
DavidRivkin Opinion: the author of this article is a hack.
DavidRivkin WSJ opinion page has become as bad as Fox news and Breitbart. Just shameless shills...so desperate
DavidRivkin Are you guys serious? opinion is an embarrassing joke.
DavidRivkin Yes, less transparency, great position.
DavidRivkin
DavidRivkin Lol, no.
DavidRivkin We have every right called treason
DavidRivkin Your support for Trump has turned your paper in to a laughingstock on the street. I know. I work on the street for 26 years. We are laughing at you. I read FT now.
DavidRivkin ”crippling his ability” say like openly critizing coequal branches of government and parroting autocratic talking points.. Your piece only makes sense if Trump never spoke 🤔
DavidRivkin I might have missed something. From what I've learned isn't separation of powers about check and balance?
DavidRivkin Separation of powers is about balance and preventing autocratic efforts by any one branch. It’s not about creating immunity for branches from others. The premise you’re implying with this is just stupid.
DavidRivkin get bent and open your eyes
DavidRivkin sAve tHe gUvmEnt! lEt tRuMp dO eVeRytHinG!!!
DavidRivkin Replace the first half of that header with “to strengthen the dictatorship” and the full sentence makes sense.
DavidRivkin Nice try imps. If it’s inherently tied to a quid pro quo for the GRU assistance in the micro targeting of campaign data and hacking of a secure email server... 🏛Then... THEY NOT ONLY HAVE THE BUSINESS OF INVESTIGATING IT, IT’S THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION ⚖️
DavidRivkin How long did they investigate where obama was born?
DavidRivkin 'defender of the Constitution' 🤭🤣
DavidRivkin resume cv Job For Better CV/Resume Writing Service please visit I love to make voices for organizations helping their customers find the best forms of themselves! I'm anticipating working with you.
DavidRivkin lol GREAT take
DavidRivkin I’m sorry, but are you insane? Despite all appearances to the contrary, and I’m certain, your every desire, America is still a democracy and your buddy, the criminal occupying the a White House, works for the people. Seems you have forgotten that?
DavidRivkin
DavidRivkin Keep trying wsj: but not a single reader thinks that the separation of powers is the reason for this article.
Rivkin and Foley are sell outs. Trump is a clear and present danger. Only the blind fail to see this.
DavidRivkin Seriously? Everyone seems to forget that he works for us! This is a democracy, not a dictatorship! We have every right to know about not only his, but his administrations activities.
DavidRivkin
DavidRivkin So there is no cure in the USA for a POTUS candidate who conspires with hostile foreign powers to put himself into office?
DavidRivkin WTF is wrong with you idiots? Do you understand separation of powers at all? Trump is not a dictator at least not yet. So go ahead try it and we will subpoena the documents and if he does not comply they will send federal marshals to seize them.
DavidRivkin I feel the same way, I should be able to do whatever I feel like doing and not have any accountability to anyone. My rule should be absolute and unquestioned.
DavidRivkin
DavidRivkin That’s ridiculous. President Trump’s activities during the 2016 campaign are highly material to the public interest. Nice try assholes.
DavidRivkin Was this the WSJ attitude, say, toward Clinton and Whitewater?
DavidRivkin Congress is most certainly entitled to see if this president colluded with Russia during his campaign to become president. The absolutely have the obligation to find out if he is working on behalf of another country!!!
DavidRivkin If he had divested himself of all prepresidential holdings prior to announcing a run, this is a valid take. Since he didn’t, and still hasn’t, not so good.
DavidRivkin WTF. Seriously good luck with that.
DavidRivkin It doesn't need to be said that this opinion never would have applied to President Obama. But I said it anyway.
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »