Dr Galliot said that in the same way car manufacturers were training self-driving cars to make ethical choices on the road, the army was considering how drones and other weapons could make decisions on the battlefield.
"But taking lethal action in a military setting does complicate things a little bit — we need to be able to figure out, 'Is that person a moral threat to us?' Is that person holding a gun? Does that person have the intention to kill or harm Australians?'"Despite the challenges still to work through, Galliot said AI weapons could in fact make war more ethical.
"The ideal is to achieve an equal or better morality as we would find in human decision-making," Dr Galliot said. The death toll was estimated to be as high as 60 people — the worst rail disaster in Serbian history.
Your 'Experts' have opinions no different from the average person. Plus, regarding the Serbian train incident, the pilot had full view of the the train track. And the bomb was not AI.
So-a couple of overseas “fact finding missions” and that’ll use up your 5 mil.
Can they kill carbon emissions?
It's hard enough to discern the difference between combatants, non-combatants, authorised militia. Compound that with a duty to protect authorised others and allies. $5m only scratches the surface. $500m and many very smart people may buy an AI sentry to man a gate. goodluck
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »