Supreme Court To Hear Court Ban On Government Contact With Social Media Companies

  • 📰 LAist
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 39 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 51%

Business News News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

The case has profound implications for almost every aspect of American life, especially at a time when there are great national security concerns about false information online.

Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland EmpireLAist is part of Southern California Public Radio, a member-supported public media network. For the latest national news from NPR and our live radio broadcast, visitIn these challenging times, the need for reliable local reporting has never been greater. Put a value on the impact of our year-round coverage.

Louisiana and Missouri sued the government, contending it has been violating the First Amendment by pressuring social media companies to correct or modify what the government deems to be misinformation online. The case is part of long-running conservative claims that liberal tech company owners are in cahoots with government officials in an attempt to suppress conservative views.

History bears that out, Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said in the government's brief. She also noted that social media companies have their own First Amendment rights to decide what content to use.Writing for the three, Justice Alito said that the government had failed to provide"any concrete proof" of imminent harm from the Fifth Circuit's ruling.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 606. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines