UBS on the brink of Switzerland’s ‘too big to fail’ reckoning

  • 📰 globebusiness
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 13 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 55%
  • Publisher: 66%

Streetwise News

Ubs,Hope,Bank

The Swiss government is this month due to publish its recommendations for policing banks that are ‘too big to fail’, which could saddle UBS with tougher business rules

rescued its stricken rival Credit Suisse a year ago, it has been waiting to hear how authorities will protect Switzerland from the risk of the country’s only remaining big bank also imploding. It is about to find out.

“Switzerland simply cannot allow UBS to fail,” said Stefan Legge, an economist at the University of St. Gallen. “If it did it would have an absolutely devastating effect on the Swiss economy.” The Swiss lower house of parliament in May 2023 backed a motion calling for systemically relevant banks to have a leverage ratio of 15 per cent of assets, far more than in the European Union, the United States and Britain.

“This can’t be done within a reasonable period by withholding profits, and raising such sums via capital markets is hardly realistic,” Ita said.Few analysts expect such onerous terms to be imposed, but it helps explain why UBS has been keen to make itself heard.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 31. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

UBS looks to keep, grow shipping loans in post-merger green overhaulExplore stories from Atlantic Canada.
Source: SaltWire Network - 🏆 45. / 63 Read more »

UBS Banker’s Frustration Exposes Cracks in World of Climate FinanceThe world’s biggest banks are quietly hanging on to carbon-intensive clients because of what they see as unrealistic demands from regulators and civil society — and the threat to their fees.
Source: BNNBloomberg - 🏆 83. / 50 Read more »