But as 60 Minutes revealed, upgrading the old 737 was easier said than done. The Max’s new fuel efficient engines were too big to fit beneath its 50-year-old body design – so they were moved forward and up.
“MCAS was not heavily reviewed. We didn’t really understand its failure modes,” the insider said, claiming that part of Boeing’s sales pitch to prospective buyers was that the 737 Max wouldn’t require costly retraining of pilots. MCAS would assure that the new Max handled the same as older 737 models.
Days after the Lion Air disaster, Boeing finally revealed the existence of the MCAS system, shocking pilots around the world. For a further five months, Boeing continued production of the Max, assuring the world that their new aircraft was safe.Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 took off from Addis Ababa at 8:38am. Six minutes later it crashed to earth in a high-speed dive reaching speeds of 900km/h. All 157 passengers and crew perished.
But despite the damning evidence of the Max’s software flaw, Boeing’s embattled CEO, Dennis Muilenburg, is standing by his plane
9NewsMelb In the interests of fairness and balance would 60 seconds like to have a program about the Airbus issues over the years as well?
9NewsMelb Relying on one sensor? Even the cheapest cars have a dual brake system. Who can ever trust in any aircraft made by that firm again?
9NewsAdel This all come out a few weeks after the last crash.
To be fair, Rosemount Aerospace, the aircraft sensor manufacturer has blood on their hands also, if it was indeed a faulty AoA sensor feeding MCAS errenous information, then MCAS was just doing what it was designed to do. Doesn’t lessen the fact that Boeing didn’t inform.
Watch their prices fall... this is disgusting. Money over peoples life.
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »