The Alberta government announced this past a week a $2.5-million panel to study the influence of foreign funding on Canadian environmental policy issues. Compared to the unprecedented planned spend of $4 billion by 29 U.S.-based philanthropic institutions over the next five years on climate philanthropy, this is a drop in the bucket.
Compared to total climate spending, U.S. foundations spend less than one per cent of the US$410 billion expenditure on climate-related activities . Charities, however, can have an outsized influence on political debates over climate change, both on the left and right side of politics.
Some of these organizations are well known from Krause’s work, including the Energy, Hewlett, McArthur, Rockefeller, Schmidt , and Moore foundations. Half of their funding has been directed to 20 groups including the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Defense Fund and New Venture Fund.
Alberta, as well as Canada, should look at these trends with a mind to our public policy objectives. Philanthropies, for example, are governed by the whims of their billionaire donors, picking solutions that may not necessarily be the best ones to solve climate change issues. Funding is concentrated in a few hands and can be discontinued abruptly, a complaint that has surfaced in recent years.
jackmintz That article has quite a strongly framed thesis that you spend very little or no time defending. For example, at no time do you even engage the issue of unclear goals. Are you doing ok? Health wise I mean.
Chasing the mystical magical environmentalist boogeyman riding a unicorn 🦄. What a waste of taxpayers money.
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »