Users will not be able to see the number of likes of reactions on a post.: Facebook—with a test in Australia—may be telegraphing a huge coming change to the social network as we know it in an effort to improve people’s self esteem: hiding like counts.
Starting on Friday, Facebook will begin a test in Australia that will prevent users from seeing likes, reactions and video views on the posts of others, a Facebook spokesperson said. Users will still be able to like and react to posts, but they just won’t be able to see an exact number of reactions. Users will also still be able to see a list of people who liked a specific post—it just won’t have the number displayed at the top.Facebook will use the results of the test to see if hiding likes makes users more comfortable without limiting their interactions. for Facebook since likes were originally a core part of the social network.
Ree_la_la rachsandl We are so vain as a people...
rachsandl facebook should see if not treating their users’ information as currency would make them happier.
rachsandl ...better. It shows C clearly prefers A. Thus this is why the reactions matter on Facebook. Before deleting my account I noticed most of my contacts ignoring my posts while others wrote or shared similar things and got replied or reacted. Facebook promotes favoritism.
rachsandl ...the trend of most posts, B will certainly feel upset of C’s undeniable preference for A than toward B. And regardless of how “childish” it may sound that B eventually gets away from C for this, truth is that no human likes a friend treating another mutual friend...
rachsandl The truth about the likes and especially the other reactions is simple: let’s put three people- A, B and C. All of the three are friends, but when A and B put similar posts, C either likes one of them, or loves A’s but only likes B’s. If B notices that this is...
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »