Among Jacob Zuma's arguments was that the court overlooked unfair delays, which he pinned on the National Prosecution Authority.and French Arms manufacturer Thales are expected to hear on Friday if they’ve succeeded in their application for leave to appeal the judgment which rejected their application for a permanent stay of prosecution.
The full bench of the Pietermaritzburg High Court heard their arguments for leave to appeal to a higher court last week.Among Zuma’s arguments was that the court overlooked unfair delays, which he pinned on the National Prosecution Authority.He argued that another court could give more consideration to the violation of his constitutional rights.
Thales argued that a higher court would find differently on the validity of the re-instatement of the charges against it.The state argued that there was no prospect that an appeal court would uphold Zuma’s baseless and insulting allegations that the High Court sanitised the National prosecuting authority’s constitutional violations.
The state also says the reasons for the decision to re-instate the charges against Thales was rational.
It is time our judiciary stood for truth and not for a back hander.
They must leave this old man nw
He won't succeed
The one who abuse her powers is Zuma .Zuma can you let court diside if you are guilty or not then you can challenge the outcome.
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SABC News Online - 🏆 32. / 51 Read more »
Source: SABC News Online - 🏆 32. / 51 Read more »