One opportunity is to turn the tool’s weakness — its unpredictability of response — into a strength.
But, when it comes to creativity and innovation — such as finding a way to improve the air travel experience or launching a new aviation venture — that same airline would prefer one idea that is excellent and nine that are nonsense, rather than a set of ten solid ideas. First, we should distinguish between using ChatGPT for idea generation and for the execution of a specific assignment. A student asking: “What would be ten course project ideas given my interest in space travel and psychology?” is an example of idea generation. “Write me a three-page essay about the role of psychology in space travel” is an example of a specific assignment.
As new versions of the technology emerge, we can imagine the user setting a balance between factually accurate and totally crazy .
Chatgpt is massively overblown solution. Success of such tools require that we humans have right judgements & how to interpret results. But we are biased with erroneous mindset making responses on ideology, socioeconomic divide create more conflicts rather than solving them
Chatgpt is massively overblown solution. Success of such tools require that we humans have right judgements & how to interpret results. But we are biased with erroneous mindset making responses on ideology, socioeconomic divide create more conflicts rather than solving them
For a version 1 release it's phenomenal