after taking part in the federal Paycheck Protection Program, despite being large firms with access to other forms of capital.so that small businesses would have a better shot at getting loans. The first round of PPP went quickly, and hundreds of thousands of small businesses were left in limbo while larger companies had greater success at tapping the program.
Blankfein may be speaking from experience: Goldman took $10 billion from the Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program at the height of the financial crisis in October 2008. Although it paid the funds back in less than two years, the move fueled public anger that financial firms had to be rescued after the industry helped cause the subprime mortgage crisis.
They should be reluctant due to the public outrage surrounding it.
The government has no money?
🤣🤣🤣 Do as I say, not as I did.
I don't know or agree with whatever you're talking about. I'll do whatever I want to do.
You should stop interviewing people like him. These are people who admit that companies have no moral obligations to rip customers off.
1. How much government money did Goldman Sachs take after the 2008 financial crisis (in which it had play a big role)? 2. Does Goldman Sachs have shares in the US Federal Reserve Systems?
'Please don't be as corrupt as the government will allow' LateStageCapitalism
Now interview a family who lost a family member.
Agreed
Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten, Deutschland Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Herkunft: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Weiterlesen »
Herkunft: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Weiterlesen »