Schultz, who stepped in as interim CEO of Starbucks in April 2022, told Harlow:"I don't think a union has a place in Starbucks."
He added:"If a de minimis group of people file for a petition to be unionized, they have a right to do so. But we as a company have a right also to say: 'We have a different vision that is better, more dynamic, and we have a history to prove it.'" Starbucks has historically painted a picture of being a progressive company that treats workers well and offers good benefits. This has included covering full college tuition for staff, health insurance, and equity through stock options.
Schultz argued that Starbucks worker unionization efforts in America are reflective of a much bigger macro problem beyond the company itself. American companies, in general, are facing unionization because"workers are upset — not so much with the company, but the situation," he told CNN.
Yes he would be against it, simple calculation hypothetically situation 1000 coffee 10 cost of making 1000 , wrk Sal 200, CEO sal 5000, profit 3800, year 2 coffee 12,cost 1200,wrk Sal 200 CEO sal 6000,profit 4600, if workers unions the profit has to decrease or management pay.
Never buying at Starbucks ever again!
Lol
“guy who doesn’t want to pay his employees a living wage thinks unions are bad for business” wow what a surprise
Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten, Deutschland Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Herkunft: wrtv - 🏆 598. / 51 Weiterlesen »
Herkunft: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Weiterlesen »