operate under a false sense of security, that most people can’t be bothered to go to court over any damages they might have inflicted. Indeed, this hubris can go so far that they will explicitly tell folks to sue them if they have a problem, not realizing that there are people out there who will take them at their word.of a farmer who had a lot of their crops damaged in a fire caused by an electrical company. When he asked for compensation for damage to his fence, they said no.
It’s also a national leader in lima beans, lemons, kumquats, raspberries, strawberries, and spinach, so it’s not surprising that you basically can’t get a good smoothie bowl without. This is all to say that the state takes its agriculture very, very seriously.
This is the real appeal of this story, as the electrical company no doubt was used to an “average” person not wanting to deal with the costs of a. While this is technically correct, it’s important to remember that an unwillingness to go to court doesn’t mean that the victim of this company is by any means in the wrong. The farmer’s “malicious compliance” is hardly malicious, as they have every right to pursue a case.
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
La source: blogTO - 🏆 44. / 63 Lire la suite »
La source: boredpanda - 🏆 18. / 72 Lire la suite »
La source: YahooFinanceCA - 🏆 47. / 63 Lire la suite »