'Squeezed out': IFM boss wants changes to help local companies win infrastructure contracts

  • 📰 smh
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 40 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 80%

Indonesia Berita Berita

Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama

One of the biggest infrastructure investors is lobbying the government to divide major job-creating projects into smaller contracts to give Australian businesses a shot.

One of the biggest infrastructure investors in the country is lobbying the government to divide major job-creating projects into smaller contracts to help Australian businesses compete for infrastructure contracts typically won by global construction giants.

"We're building these Australian projects and it's Australian constructors that are getting squeezed out," Mr Neal said.Instead, he wants major developments broken up into smaller projects and the opportunity for equity partners to enter long-term arrangements with the government in a proposal he describes as being "four wins" for the economy, jobs, super fund members and local companies.

However, a multi-billion dollar bid from a private consortium including IFM to build Melbourne's airport rail link isDespite this, Mr Neal said there had been "lots of interest" across state and federal governments about IFM's suggested changes to the procurement rules. IFM manages about $150 billion, including $70 billion in infrastructure.

 

Terima kasih atas komentar Anda. Komentar Anda akan dipublikasikan setelah ditinjau.
Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

 /  🏆 6. in İD

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Labels warning pregnant women not to drink could change, and alcohol companies are unhappyThe alcohol industry in Australia is arguing that proposed changes to labelling would cost too much, but a prominent medical researcher says this argument is 'an absolute furphy'. World of difference between the one the evidence shows they should have, and the one they’re trying to get away with. They need to examine their consciences. While we’re at it, how are tobacco products still legal? becoz the cigarette labels made a difference 😂 🙄
Sumber: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Baca lebih lajut »