Art and Industry: The Mazer v. Stein Copyright Showdown

Mazer v. Stein, 347 U.S Court Filing, retrieved on September 27, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This part is 1 of 3. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Introduction Respondents are engaged in the manufacture and sale of electric lamps. One of the respondents created original works of sculpture, from the models of which china statuettes were made. The statuettes were used as bases for fully equipped electric lamps, which respondents sold.

That the statuettes, fitted as lamps or unfitted, may be patentable does not bar their copyright as works of art. Pp. 215-217. The intended or actual use in industry of an article eligible for- copyright does not bar or invalidate its registration. P. 218. The subsequent registration of a work of art published as an element in a manufactured article is not a misuse of the copyright. Pp. 218-219. 204 F.

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Nickel debacle casts long shadow as industry masses in LondonThe ramifications of 2022's London Metal Exchange nickel trading debacle, including potential challenges to its nickel contract and the fate of the exchange itself will be hot topics next week as the metals industry descends on London. On March 8, last year, the 145-year old exchange was plunged into crisis - forced to halt nickel trading for the first time since 1988 - when prices more than doubled in a few hours to records above $100 000 a metric ton.
Sumber: MiningWeeklyAUS - 🏆 233. / 63 Baca lebih lajut »