On Wednesday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Murthy v. Missouri, a case spurred by conservative state attorneys general about whether the Biden administration illegally coerced social media companies to remove speech it didn’t like. In a 6-3 decision, the court reversed the decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had found unconstitutional coercion in the government’s conduct.
” On top of that, the timing of platforms’ content moderation decisions that were in question cast doubts on the causal relationship between government pressure and the platforms’ choices, according to the court.
Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court rejects challenge to Biden administration's contacts with social media companiesThe court determined that the users and two states, Louisiana and Missouri, did not have the legal right to seek an injunction against the Biden administration in federal court.
Sumber: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court Won’t Stop Biden Administration From Working With Social Media CompaniesAlison Durkee is a senior reporter covering breaking news, with a focus on legal issues and U.S. politics. She joined Forbes in 2020 and is based in London and New York, covering such topics as the Supreme Court, litigation against Donald Trump and clashes over abortion rights. Durkee previously covered U.S.
Sumber: ForbesTech - 🏆 318. / 59 Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court tosses out claim Biden administration coerced social media companies to remove contentLawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for NBC News.
Sumber: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Baca lebih lajut »