Image credits:While OP does not provide the exact reasoning behind these decisions, it’s pretty clear that somewhere “upstairs” someone messed up and seems to be refusing to see reality. There are a number of possibilities. The HR team is so stubborn that they will tank the company over this issue, or that someone making that decision believes that “giving in” is equivalent to admitting they were wrong.
In general, the fact that there was just one person as a linchpin to so many projects is a management failure on so many levels. Even if this employee was happy to carry such a weight on their shoulders indefinitely, accidents happen, people get sick, injured, or need to go on vacation. More realistically, even if this worker is relatively happy, they will burn out. While we often
, which absolutely do cause it, this problem can strike even motivated employees. Even if OP’s coworker wasn’t leaving, he would likely need to take a break after a year or two anyway.Seeing as this worker covered so many projects, burnout, a new job or even death would all basically mean the same level of disaster for the company. The middle option really should not be a surprise for anyone involved, as it’s pretty common knowledge that workers who feel undervalued are simply.
ایران آخرین اخبار, ایران سرفصلها
Similar News:همچنین می توانید اخبار مشابهی را که از منابع خبری دیگر جمع آوری کرده ایم، بخوانید.
منبع: blogTO - 🏆 44. / 63 ادامه مطلب »
منبع: CBCNews - 🏆 2. / 99 ادامه مطلب »
منبع: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 ادامه مطلب »