The message has been cited in dozens of articles dissecting the WHO's early response to the pandemic, and is widely quoted on social media as an unusually clear example of advice that is unambiguously wrong in hindsight.
, it was internal WHO discomfort with these warnings that prompted the "no clear transmission" tweet."[The tweet] was issued on the same day the WHO's technical lead on Covid-19, Maria Van Kerkhove gave a press briefing in Geneva warning of precisely the opposite — the potential for rapid spread. The article goes on to note that the tweet "does not appear to have been part of a deliberate strategy" to appease China.Emily Ruahala of The Washington Post this week reported comments
Who believes WHO anymore? Covid_19
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
The smiling assassin. Political opponents bang gone.
NoQuartersFor I reckon China have made Tedros Adhanom a very rich man.
It's in the air.
Adolf Hitler would admire Xi
Wake Up. Ovcourse
self evident facts while pandemic spread enormously it took months to publish what WHO claimed to be a wrongful/malicious statement abt.Covid_19 & the non-human transmission when the facts dictated otherwise...it remains to reveal as to why rather then if
'They waited for a further six days before making that information public.' - it was six weeks. We know that WHO failed to protect us. Now we need a new organisation because nobody trusts this one.
This one
The entire WHO top brass, the top 20 or so officials must be let go and instead the G20 ex China should put in a new team.
Communist. Terrorist group. Dictatorship. Sounds fitting. DrTedros
abubakarsanusi_ 'Report says' usually means we reserve the rights to spread rumors. Be specific. Tell us who exactly said it.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
ソース: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 続きを読む »
ソース: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 続きを読む »
ソース: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 続きを読む »