Advice | My company stock options are worthless

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 80 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 35%
  • Publisher: 72%

日本 ニュース ニュース

日本 最新ニュース,日本 見出し

Perspective: Stock options offer employees a chance to gamble on the company’s success, but not everyone walks away richer.

Anyone employed by my company for a year is granted a certain number of stock options as a “bonus.” In informal conversation, one of my supervisors estimated our stock options would be worth somewhere north of $500,000 if we went public or were acquired.A few weeks ago, we learned that all of the company’s patents, licenses, and other intellectual property had been sold off. The officers of the company all resigned after taking large severance checks. The company will be utterly worthless soon.

I know it’s not right, but was this even legal? Several of us have considered legal action. Do I jump ship now and give up?It was a time of screechy dial-up internet and flip phones, when investors were throwing funds at any start-up with “dot com” in its name. Stock options were a common hiring incentive, and if you happened to exercise those options and maybe sell the stock at the right time, you had it made.

Then around the turn-of-the-century, the bubble burst. Start-ups sputtered, and the stock options employees hoped would make them millionaires instead became millstones. When a company’s stock bottomed out, employees who had exercised their options lost their investment, some ending up with huge tax bills they couldn’t afford even though they never saw a dime of stock money.

The point of that vignette is, those of us who watched this happen the first time are wary of stock-based compensation packages, but a new generation of workers is having to learn it the hard way. Stock options offer employees a chance to gamble on the company’s success, but not everyone walks away richer. In the Great Silicon Rush, “for all the people that made it, there were 100 that didn’t,” says Robert Ellerbrock, a partner at FisherBroyles specializing in benefits law.

No, it’s not right or good that leadership cashed out and left employees holding a soon-to-be-empty bag. But, says, Ellerbrock, “whoever has the majority of equity will do what’s best for shareholders” and for the company overall. Sometimes that means liquidating assets and cutting losses.

 

コメントありがとうございます。コメントは審査後に公開されます。
このニュースをすぐに読めるように要約しました。ニュースに興味がある場合は、ここで全文を読むことができます。 続きを読む:

 /  🏆 95. in JP

日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し

Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。

Goldman Sachs warns stock market may not have hit bottom yetThe stock market relief rally could fade soon as investors confront scorching-hot inflation and continued interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve. Wrong again 'may not have' 🤣🤣🤣 Never follow $GS WallStreet always wins $SPY $DIA $QQQ $SPX muppets
ソース: FoxBusiness - 🏆 458. / 53 続きを読む »

Affordable housing concerns prompt Juneau Assembly to take stock of short-term rental marketThe Juneau Assembly has approved spending $20,000 to hire a firm to collect data on short-term rentals in the city. City officials are concerned the listings could be eating into Juneau’s already very limited housing stock. The Juneau assembly should utilize that $20,000 to study the opening up of more land for housing development. Instead of focusing on what people can and cannot do with their homes.
ソース: KTOOpubmedia - 🏆 439. / 53 続きを読む »