If Alan Jones is free to speak, in a free market his sponsors are too | Richard Denniss

  • 📰 The Guardian
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 53%

日本 ニュース ニュース

日本 最新ニュース,日本 見出し

Pulling ads from the shock jock’s show is mocked as ‘virtue signalling’. But in consumer capitalism it’s known as branding

Are free markets more important than free speech? We aren’t supposed to ask such questions because each of those libertarian goals was supposed to reinforce the other. But they clearly don’t, so it’s time to take a closer look at what “freedom” really means in Australia today.

 

コメントありがとうございます。コメントは審査後に公開されます。

Lovely peach suit

Consumer capitalism IS the problem with Allen Jones, you numpties, it is not some ideologically neutral tool. God help us, harnessing the power of capitalism for social causes delivered us the totally compromised same-sex-marriage campaign which has led to the religious bill.

This essential liberal 'vote with your dollar' argument is totally flawed because it leaves any movement fundamentally unable to draw distinctions and moral principles in its own right. Look at all this mewing and postulating - no wonder 'progressive' libs can't win elections.

Everyone should be free to speak — Tommy Robinson too! freespeech FreeTommyRobinson

I cant imagine anyone but really angry white geriatrics listening to Alan Jones

このニュースをすぐに読めるように要約しました。ニュースに興味がある場合は、ここで全文を読むことができます。 続きを読む:

 /  🏆 84. in JP

日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し