SoftBank should walk swiftly away from any investment in WeWork

  • 📰 BDliveSA
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 57 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 63%

대한민국 뉴스 뉴스

A $5bn stake in a company about shared office space in the time of social-distancing and Covid-19, is a bad idea writes Tim Culpan

SoftBank Group needs to cut and run on its entire WeWork investment, not just the shares. Covid-19 and the economics of a prolonged crisis necessitate strict pragmatism.

After a $1.5bn lifeline late last year, the next step in SoftBank’s bailout of the office rental company — predicated on completing the share purchase — was to be a further $5bn in debt financing. With WeWork bonds trading at about 36c on the dollar and the global economy in upheaval over the coronavirus pandemic, there’s no price in the world that could have made SoftBank’s double-down on the shares look smart. Pouring $5bn into WeWork debt would be a poor use of its funds.Last week, Moody’s Investors Service cut its debt by two notches, citing SoftBank’s planned offload of assets that amounts to little more than a fire sale.

Despite a broad portfolio that includes its stake in the Vision Fund, its domestic telecoms operator, a US telco, and a semi-conductor company, the only asset SoftBank has of significant value is its 25% stake in Alibaba Group. Those shares aren’t very liquid and could take months to sell. Son doesn’t have time. Many Alibaba investors believe that the e-commerce company has got through the worst of the Covid-19 crisis and will benefit from a return to normalcy in China.

 

귀하의 의견에 감사드립니다. 귀하의 의견은 검토 후 게시됩니다.
이 소식을 빠르게 읽을 수 있도록 요약했습니다. 뉴스에 관심이 있으시면 여기에서 전문을 읽으실 수 있습니다. 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오:

 /  🏆 12. in KR

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

CHRIS GILMOUR: Market at odds with African Rainbow’s valuation of unlisted investmentsAfrican Rainbow Capital Investments’ discount to NAV remains stubbornly wide I knew this was about to start, simply because of the R1billion donation. It's simply because people are aware that the other billions aren't really donations The true gem of Rainbow's treasure should be Rain. All the other stuff come second to it. With that said, valuation of an asset based on how much money it might make in the future will always be tricky.
출처: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

TeleMasters shares fall despite bet on a new business modelThe company is moving away from the traditional variable billing service to subscription-based services
출처: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »