More than €500,000 in building charges paid by Portobello Plaza hotel developers to Dublin City Council | Business Post

Permission for the development was granted with conditions by Dublin City Council in 2018, but conditions were overturned by An Bord Pleanála in 2019 following an appeal from the developers. Picture: Sasko Lazarov/RollingNews.ie

Developers of a hotel beside Portobello Plaza have paid €500,000 to Dublin City Council in building charges for a €40 million project. The developers of the new Nyx Hotel at Portobello Harbour have paid at least €505,542.90 to date, figures disclosed by the council show. The public space, which had been closed for parts of the summer, has been cordoned off while construction takes place.Subscribe from just €1 for the first month!

México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares

Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.

Publican may regain possession of Iveagh MarketTemple Bar publican Martin Keane could be given back possession of the Iveagh Market as a result of ongoing negotiations with the Guinness family and Dublin City Council. So he take ownership and continue to let it rot? If he he doesn't have the funds to develop the site, which appears he doesn't, what good is it. His other sites are falling down too, and are everything that's wrong with Temple Bar Maybe everyone should boycote his pub and hotel in Temple bar. Was amazing in its day I’m told. It’s exactly what the city needs more off.
Fuente: rtenews - 🏆 1. / 99 Leer más »

Revenues at US-backed Dublin firm Valeo topped €1bn in 2020 | Business PostDriven by a multimillion-euro acquisition spree, Valeo’s sales have soared by almost 75 per cent in the last five years, while the group’s asset value has almost doubled in the same period to over €1.5 billion – LorcanAllen reports.
Fuente: businessposthq - 🏆 8. / 71 Leer más »

Group opposing D3 build-to-rent scheme will not appeal court decision | Business PostAlfonso Bonilla and Rob Curley, two architects who objected to the residential project, said they decided not to pursue a judicial review after receiving legal advice on potentially onerous costs – KillianWoods reports. killianwoods The subeditor appears to have mangled the article title - “will not appeal court decision” - should read “will not judicially review {or, ‘challenge in court’} a planning decision”.
Fuente: businessposthq - 🏆 8. / 71 Leer más »