Biden administration tells Supreme Court law protecting social media companies has limits

  • 📰 STForeignDesk
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 71%

Malaysia News News

Malaysia Malaysia Latest News,Malaysia Malaysia Headlines

Social media companies cannot be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by other users. Read more at straitstimes.com.

WASHINGTON - The Biden administration argued to the US Supreme Court on Wednesday that social media giants like Google could in some instances have responsibility for user content, adopting a stance that could potentially undermine a federal law shielding companies from liability.

The family argued that Google was in part liable for Gonzalez’ death because YouTube, which is owned by the tech giant, essentially recommended videos by the Islamic State group to some users through its algorithms. Google and YouTube are part of Alphabet Inc. Section 230 holds that social media companies cannot be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by other users.

Republicans say it allows censorship of voices on the right and other politically unpopular opinions, pointing to decisions by Facebook and Twitter to ban dissemination of a New York Post article about the son of then-Democratic candidate Joe Biden’s adult son, Hunter, in October 2020.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 4. in MY

Malaysia Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Malaysia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Biden admin tells Supreme Court law protecting social media companies has limitsThe Biden administration argued to the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday that social media giants like Google could in some instances have responsibility for user content, adopting a stance that could potentially undermine a federal law shielding companies from liability.Lawyers for the U.S. Department of J
Source: ChannelNewsAsia - 🏆 6. / 66 Read more »