Industry funds push for fee overhaul as super complaints double

  • 📰 smh
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 33 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 80%

Россия Новости Новости

Россия Последние новости,Россия Последние новости

Not-for-profit superannuation funds are pushing the government’s financial dispute body to change its funding mechanism | clancyyeates

AFCA recently told super funds it will charge them significantly more than last year, as it has received more than twice the number of superannuation complaints than it expected.In other industries covered by AFCA, such as banking, its funding model is uncontentious, because institutions pay the cost of dealing with complaints made against them.

"Industry super funds recognise and support the critical work AFCA does to protect consumer interests and ensure a fair superannuation system. It is important there is adequate funding to ensure consumers can have complaints resolved quickly and all institutions should pay their fair share," Mr Linden said.

This is best achieved through a funding model that sees institutions that have a poor complaint track record paying more.The Hayne royal commission applied particularly ferocious scrutiny to several retail funds and how they managed the conflict between making returns for members and returns for their shareholders.

 

Спасибо за ваш комментарий. Ваш комментарий будет опубликован после проверки
Мы обобщили эту новость, чтобы вы могли ее быстро прочитать.Если новость вам интересна, вы можете прочитать полный текст здесь Прочитайте больше:

 /  🏆 6. in RU

Россия Последние новости, Россия Последние новости

Similar News:Вы также можете прочитать подобные новости, которые мы собрали из других источников новостей

Biggest super fund vows to vote against companies with one woman boardsAustralianSuper will vote against the election of directors at more than 50 companies in the ASX200 that have just one or no women on their board | carawaters carawaters Is this disruptive action really in the interests of fund members? Do the woke board members even acknowledge their fiduciary duty?
Источник: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Прочитайте больше »

Biggest super fund vows to vote against companies with one woman boardsAustralianSuper will vote against the election of directors at more than 50 companies in the ASX200 that have just one or no women on their board | carawaters carawaters Is this disruptive action really in the interests of fund members? Do the woke board members even acknowledge their fiduciary duty?
Источник: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Прочитайте больше »