Breakingviews - March’s market bailout demands regulatory payback

  • 📰 Breakingviews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 62 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 28%
  • Publisher: 51%

المملكة العربية السعودية أخبار أخبار

المملكة العربية السعودية أحدث الأخبار,المملكة العربية السعودية عناوين

After the 2008 crisis, regulators’ task was clear: banks needed more capital and bigger buffers of liquid assets. The March market panic and subsequent bailout demand a similar reckoning, but the necessary reforms are far less obvious, writes peter_tl:

LONDON - After the panic comes the bailout. And after the bailout comes the reckoning. In 2008, governments rescued banks and then embarked on a decade-long overhaul to ensure they would never need to do so again. This year’s pandemic-induced meltdown in financial markets, which prompted similarly unprecedented interventions, has sparked a comparable backlash.

Bank reforms were partly responsible for the market ructions this time round. After 2008, regulators explicitly set out to shift risks, such as proprietary bets on property or commodities, from bank balance sheets to investment funds better suited to coping with asset gyrations. They succeeded.

These interventions were, as the FSB noted last week, “speedy, sizeable and sweeping”. They were also effective: with the help of large-scale government spending, markets quickly rebounded. Yet the crisis still raises urgent questions for financial authorities. Malfunctioning markets impose extra costs on companies, consumers and governments. And if central banks make a habit of propping them up in a crisis, investors will be motivated to be more reckless in future.

Yet focusing on specific parts of the world’s financial plumbing risks missing the broader lesson, which is that markets magnified the economic shock of Covid-19. For example, consider hedge funds which arbitrage price differences between U.S. Treasury bonds and futures contracts. In normal times this activity appears to improve the market. But in March, as investors sold Treasuries to raise cash, hedge funds joined the rush for the exit.

 

شكرًا لك على تعليقك. سيتم نشر تعليقك بعد مراجعته.
لقد قمنا بتلخيص هذا الخبر حتى تتمكن من قراءته بسرعة. إذا كنت مهتمًا بالأخبار، يمكنك قراءة النص الكامل هنا. اقرأ أكثر:

 /  🏆 470. in SA

المملكة العربية السعودية أحدث الأخبار, المملكة العربية السعودية عناوين

Similar News:يمكنك أيضًا قراءة قصص إخبارية مشابهة لهذه التي قمنا بجمعها من مصادر إخبارية أخرى.

March’s market bailout demands regulatory paybackCentral banks were right to prop up financial markets when the pandemic caused panic. But their support exposed structural flaws and may lead to future recklessness. Preventing that requires regulators to extend their reach. Compared to 2008, the reforms are less obvious.
مصدر: Breakingviews - 🏆 470. / 51 اقرأ أكثر »

Breakingviews - Shaky electric-car maker zips into market maniaFaraday Future is driving headlong into two market manias with multiple hazard lights blinking bright red. The fledgling electric-car firm, which has yet to sell a single vehicle, will capitalise on exuberance for green transport by going public through a shell company,... Breakingviews petesweeneypro KatrinaHamlin Couple of months ago I came across a recommendation about DennisWilliam77 wealth how he helped investors to earn lots of money with their investments. and I decided to give a trial with the little I have. Now my little has turned into something great which was not my expectation Does she fly this car 😳
مصدر: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 اقرأ أكثر »

Searching for the next buyers of this bull market with inflows surging and the consensus longCorporations, money markets and systemic hedge funds could be possible next sources of demand for stocks. Big investment ops during a global Pandemic for companies who have all their products and services online, nothing for firms whose products involve walk-in or in-person anything, very bad.
مصدر: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 اقرأ أكثر »