The Supreme Court ruled Friday that a rifle fitted with a rapid-fire accessory known as a bump stock is not an illegal machine gun. The court’s conservative majority said Friday that then-President Donald Trump’s administration overstepped its authority with the 2019 ban on the firearm attachment, which allows semiautomatic weapons to fire like machine guns.Bump stocks are accessories that replace a rifle’s stock, the part that gets pressed against the shooter’s shoulder.
Authorities found an arsenal of 23 assault-style rifles in the shooter’s hotel room, including 14 weapons fitted with bump stocks. The court’s three liberal justices opposed the ruling. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent that there’s no common sense difference between a machine gun and a semiautomatic firearm with a bump stock.
The case didn’t directly address the Second Amendment rights of gun owners. Instead, Cargill’s attorneys argued that the ATF overstepped its authority by banning bump stocks. Mark Chenoweth, president of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, said his group wouldn’t have sued if Congress had banned them by law.The Supreme Court took up the case after lower federal courts delivered conflicting rulings on whether the ATF could ban bump stocks.
المملكة العربية السعودية أحدث الأخبار, المملكة العربية السعودية عناوين
Similar News:يمكنك أيضًا قراءة قصص إخبارية مشابهة لهذه التي قمنا بجمعها من مصادر إخبارية أخرى.
مصدر: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 اقرأ أكثر »