SBS Transit lawsuit: Ex-driver says company's built-in overtime is confusing

  • 📰 straits_times
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 51 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 69%

Sverige Nyheter Nyheter

Sverige Senaste nytt,Sverige Rubriker

SINGAPORE - The lawyer for transport operator SBS Transit sought to show in the High Court on Wednesday that bus drivers benefit from what it calls a"built-in overtime" component in their pay.

SINGAPORE - The lawyer for transport operator SBS Transit sought to show in the High Court on Wednesday that bus drivers benefit from what it calls a"built-in overtime" component in their pay.

Senior Counsel Davinder Singh suggested that Mr Chua's misunderstanding of built-in overtime was a reason for the"wrong" numbers which led the former driver to allege that he hadMr Chua, 62, who worked for SBST from April 2017 to February 2020, is seeking unspecified damages from SBST, claiming among other things, that he was underpaid for overtime work.

He also argued that he should be paid for"idle time" - the time spent waiting to start work at the bus depot and waiting for the company transport after work. Once a driver works for 43.5 hours, which excludes rest and meal times, he would be paid his salary plus the built-in overtime.Mr Singh said overtime pay as well as the bus drivers' weekly allowance were computed on a higher rate because of the inclusion of the built-in overtime, or BIOT, component.Mr Singh added that it was clear from the documents before the court that Mr Chua never worked more than 72 overtime hours as he had claimed.

 

Tack för din kommentar. Din kommentar kommer att publiceras efter att ha granskats.
Vi har sammanfattat den här nyheten så att du kan läsa den snabbt. Om du är intresserad av nyheterna kan du läsa hela texten här. Läs mer:

 /  🏆 5. in SE

Sverige Senaste nytt, Sverige Rubriker

Similar News:Du kan också läsa nyheter som liknar den här som vi har samlat in från andra nyhetskällor.

SBS Transit lawsuit: Ex-driver says company's built-in overtime is confusingThe lawyer for transport operator SBS Transit (SBST) sought to show in the High Court on Wednesday (March 23) that bus drivers benefit from what it calls a 'built-in overtime' component in their pay. But former driver Chua Qwong Meng, who is leading a court fight by 13...
Källa: thenewpaper - 🏆 7. / 63 Läs mer »

Request vs require: Bus driver suing SBS Transit says made to work excessive OT, company says his calculations wrongSINGAPORE - A former SBS Transit (SBST) bus driver alleged that he was made to work more than the legal limit of 72 hours of overtime a month on multiple occasions, as the hearing into an employment suit opened in the High Court on Tuesday (March 22). In the closely watched test case against the transport operator, Mr Chua Qwong...
Källa: asiaonecom - 🏆 10. / 59 Läs mer »

SBS Transit lawsuit: Ex-driver says company's built-in overtime is confusingThe lawyer for transport operator SBS Transit (SBST) sought to show in the High Court on Wednesday (March 23) that bus drivers benefit from what it calls a 'built-in overtime' component in their pay. But former driver Chua Qwong Meng, who is leading a court fight by 13...
Källa: thenewpaper - 🏆 7. / 63 Läs mer »