B.C. court rules forestry company must pay $343,000 cost of 2016 wildfire suppression

  • 📰 CHEK_News
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 21 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 55%

Sverige Nyheter Nyheter

Sverige Senaste nytt,Sverige Rubriker

A B.C. judge has upheld more than $343,000 in cost-recovery fines that were handed to a forestry company for starting a wildfire in 2016.

Softwood lumber is pictured at Tolko Industries in Heffley Creek, B.C., Sunday, April, 1, 2018.

The court heard that four so-called holdover fires were reported by Tolko to the BC Wildfire Service for starting active fires in the spring of 2016. However, Supreme Court Justice Michael Brundrett says in his decision that the commission made a mistake when it interpreted “fire” to mean “wildfire,” separating the intentional act of starting the burn pile from the wildfire that resulted from it.

 

Tack för din kommentar. Din kommentar kommer att publiceras efter att ha granskats.
Vi har sammanfattat den här nyheten så att du kan läsa den snabbt. Om du är intresserad av nyheterna kan du läsa hela texten här. Läs mer:

 /  🏆 59. in SE

Sverige Senaste nytt, Sverige Rubriker

Similar News:Du kan också läsa nyheter som liknar den här som vi har samlat in från andra nyhetskällor.

B.C. court rules forestry company must pay $343,000 cost of 2016 wildfire suppressionVANCOUVER — A British Columbia Supreme Court judge has upheld more than $343,000 in cost-recovery fines that were handed to a forestry company for starting a wildfire in 2016. A decision posted Monday says the wildfire near Nazko, in central B.C.
Källa: timescolonist - 🏆 15. / 75 Läs mer »

B.C. court rules forestry company must pay $343,000 cost of fighting 2016 wildfireA B.C. Supreme Court judge has upheld more than $343,000 in cost\u002Drecovery fines that were handed to a forestry company for starting a wildfire in 2016.
Källa: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Läs mer »

B.C. court rules forestry company must pay $343,000 cost of 2016 wildfire suppressionSupreme Court Justice Michael Brundrett says in his decision that the Forest Appeals Commission made a mistake when it interpreted ‘fire’ to mean ‘wildfire,’ separating the intentional act of starting the burn pile from the wildfire that followed
Källa: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Läs mer »