The foundation was reacting to the court’s decision to grant an urgent interdict to allow Ramaphosa not to appear in court on Thursday this week to answer to former President Jacob Zuma’s bid to privately prosecute Ramaphosa.
of January was not material, this contention misses the point. The harm lies not in the temporary inconvenience of physically attending a hearing if only for a formal postponement. The critical harm concerns a fundamentally, constitutionally guaranteed right to personal freedom. That value which is foundational to our constitutional order may never be treated lightly.
Zuma wants Ramaphosa to be recalled and ANC to lose the elections in 2024
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
The court has not erred. The court has still to make a decision on the merits of the application, which will happen soon.
By this logic making someone appear in court on a false charge wouldn't harmful if they're acquitted. This utter nonsense. Nobody should be made to appear in any court unless they have lawfully charged and lawfully summoned to appear. This isn't hard.
Only paid will feel for Ramaphosa why pity him? Suffer harm what a judicial decision to protect one man.
So where to now seen that they always like to Appeal
Use the amount you can afford join now and get profit from Bitcoin investment through Brandonkaren11 Bitcoin mining investment platform , i love you for helping me
But the court did not err here
Jacob Zuma must remove dirt from his eyes before seeing it from another person. He was the first man to undermined our justice system. He is causing confusion to our liberation movement day by day.
Agh Please. You has became a nuisance
This is how they always think
Mandela appeared in JHB HIGH Court charged by Louis Lyt … and ?
Shi* report as usual from shi* media🚮🚮
Pathetic reporting. So your actual article just quote that the case is erred without mentioning the source? Do better, unless that's also your standpoint.
So the aim is not to harm😁