Toxic masculinity. Pipeline protests. The dark side of clean energy. This year’s nominees for the Writers’ Trust Shaughnessy Cohen Prize for Political Writing touch on both deeply personal issues of identity and community and hot-button public policy issues. The National Post talked to the authors in the countdown to the award, a $25,000 prize to be announced May 15.SC: Large hydro dams are a hugely expensive and destructive way to generate renewable energy.
Just how “clean” big hydro dams really are is called into question by many scientists. One study by U.S. scientists shows that reservoirs produce considerably more carbon emissions than anticipated. About 80 per cent of these emissions are in the form of methane, a greenhouse gas 34 times more potent than carbon dioxide.
B.C.’s Liberal government, fearful of a third rejection, changed the law in 2010 to strip the commission’s oversight of Site C. When the NDP came to power in 2017, it fulfilled an election promise to send the project to the BCUC for a fast-tracked three-month review. But, notably, it didn’t allow the BCUC to determine whether or not proceeding with Site C was in the public interest and the BCUC wasn’t given the most up-to-date financial information for the project for its review.
Two direct-award contracts worth a total of almost $11 million were given to a B.C. numbered company whose officers and directors turned out to be top executives of Petrowest, the Alberta company that went bankrupt and was dismissed from Site C’s main civil works consortium. The largest of the contracts, for $10.1 million, was awarded to the numbered company in late July 2017 — just two weeks before Petrowest was dismissed from the Site C consortium for insolvency.
SC: It’s difficult to judge. Two Treaty 8 First Nations have filed civil claims alleging the Site C dam and two previous dams on the Peace River unjustifiably infringe on their treaty rights. They lost an application for an injunction to stop work on Site C but the judge ruled that their case must be heard by 2023, prior to reservoir filling slated for 2024 — a timeline that may not be met given a patterns of schedule delays on other projects.
The only clean power that is truly clean is nuclear.
Once built, a hydroelectric installation neither consumes fuel, nor emits waste. New turbines and generators are highly efficient; and can reliably meet peak power demands, something wind and solar cannot do.
Would building a city be any different destroying the environment ! So be more city just small little villages scattered around . No more pavement as it takes for ever to breakdown ,worse then roundup . Which does breakdown! Land wasted no production. Then tall skyscrapers hurt !
No hydro, no fossil, no nuclear; thats going 2 put quite a strain on society’s energy demands. We all know what relationship pricing & demand have
Sverige Senaste nytt, Sverige Rubriker
Similar News:Du kan också läsa nyheter som liknar den här som vi har samlat in från andra nyhetskällor.
Källa: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Läs mer »