Harry's failed acquisition spurs questions on Proctor & Gamble's role - Business Insider

  • 📰 BusinessInsider
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 57 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 51%

ประเทศไทย ข่าว ข่าว

ประเทศไทย ข่าวล่าสุด,ประเทศไทย หัวข้อข่าว

Harry's had plans to sell for $1.4 billion before the government moved to kill the deal. Some are speculating that its biggest rival could be partly responsible for the acquisition falling apart.

At the time, some analysts said Coca-Cola's planned acquisition wasto torpedo the Pepsi deal. They argued that if regulators approved the earlier deal, it couldn't reject the Coca-Cola deal, which was similar in size.

The smaller of the two conglomerates, Edgewell had 15% of the wet shave razor market in 2018, compared to Gillette's half,The buyout also would have put the Harry's cofounders in control of Edgewell's domestic business, which includes wet shave razor manufacturers Schick, Intuition, and Skintimate, as well as sunscreen brands Banana Boat and Hawaiian Tropic.

Steve Salop, a professor at Georgetown Law who teaches courses in antitrust law, said Procter & Gamble would have "independent reasons" for wanting to buy a razor company that appeals to a base of younger consumers. BillieBuying a business to thwart another acquisition is also not a very effective strategy, said the anti trust attorney who requested to remain anonymous. The Federal Trade Commission is "too unpredictable" to assume it can be manipulated.

Salop also pointed out that the timeline doesn't support the argument that Procter & Gamble bought a company to scuttle a rival's deal. The Billie sale came about eight months after Schick owner Edgewell announced its acquisition of Harry's.

 

ขอบคุณสำหรับความคิดเห็นของคุณ ความคิดเห็นของคุณจะถูกเผยแพร่หลังจากได้รับการตรวจสอบแล้ว
เราได้สรุปข่าวนี้มาให้อ่านอย่างรวดเร็ว หากสนใจข่าว สามารถอ่านฉบับเต็มได้ที่นี่ อ่านเพิ่มเติม:

 /  🏆 729. in TH

ประเทศไทย ข่าวล่าสุด, ประเทศไทย หัวข้อข่าว